PGHIMC - Pittsburgh Independent Media Center

Sonia Gandhi is Islamic Jihadi appeaser
by Save India Sunday, Aug. 07, 2005 at 11:16 AM

Indians and world wake up. SONIA GANDHI is silently supporting Jihad in India. WORLD MUST KNOW HER TRUE COLOR >>> INDIANS WAKR UP , U R SONIA GANDHI IS A NATIONAL SECURITY THREAD . KICK HER FAMILY OUT OF INDIA . SHE WANT TO IMPOSE DYNASTY IN INDIA>>> DO U WANT RAHUL GANHI AS U R NEXT PM ?????

Why Sonia Gandhi , Super PM of India is terriried of Islamic violence ?

by IntelliBriefs Friday, Jul. 22, 2005 at 3:03 PM

Must read to know real Sonia Gandhi , appeaser of Islamicists . She is a threat to India

What is happenning in Italian court in Delhi--at 10 Janpath

Recently there was an informal chat among Intelligence community and experts in India about the chances of a joint US-Britain-India task force on Pakistan terror , say, after Blair and Bush recognize that without India's help this task force will be a flop. One has even suggested to join "Aliance Base" , top secret center in Paris, code-named Alliance Base . This intelligence centre was set up by the CIA and French intelligence services in 2002 . "Such joint intelligence work has been responsible for identifying, tracking and capturing or killing the vast majority of committed jihadists who have been targeted outside Iraq and Afghanistan since the Sept 11, 2001, attacks"

The Alliance Base is headed by a French general working for the General Directorate for External Security (DGSE), the French equivalent of the CIA. The base has officers from Britain, France, Germany, Canada, Australia and the United States. The report explains: "To play down the US role, the centre's working language is French. The base selects its cases carefully, chooses a lead country for each operation, and that country's service runs the operation."
"Could a similar set up be envisaged between US/Britain and India - which had been subjected to hundreds of terrorist attacks during the past decades - and the United States? " questioned an journalist . The response was "If you join with Britain now, India will end up having to defend the British. "

Here is an explanation from an expert ." My view based both on personal contact and public postures: Britain is a rapidly declining power, not so much for its weak military as for its weakening morale and the political will to fight evil. "

"British inclination to compromise rather than confront is an an admirable quality in dealing with reasonable people. But it is not going to work with Islam. See how even after two attacks within two weeks, Blair and others don't want to mention the word Jihad. This suits the Muslim leaders fine. They can hide behind vague noises about extremism, fanaticism and the like, while the mosques and Mardasas can keep preaching Jihad."

"See the latest statements by the Mayor of London. He blames British Government policy in Palestine and Iraq-- not the teachings of Islam! He is just mouthing Muslim rhetoric. This is what Britain has come to. "

"A few more threats and bombs will bring Britain to its knees. You want an alliance with these people? It will be back to the days of the Empire, with Indian soldiers protecting the British Empire."

What is happening with the Italian court in Delhi-- at 10 Janpath

Note that this is what is happening with the Italian court in Delhi-- at 10 Janpath. Sonia is appeasing Muslims at every turn-- from the Imrana case to Sharia to Ayodhya, but she wants Indian (meaning Hindu) men to provide security for her and her family. Will she hire Muslims to be her bodyguards?

" Please understand what is going on: Sonia the "super PM" is super-terrified of Muslim violence. She knows that they pose the greatest threat to her safety. Petrified by this fear, she will never say no to any Muslim demand. Her Law minister Bharadwaj came out with the statement that the Government cannot interfere in the Imrana case and cannot consider a Uniform Civil Code. So you have parallel courts in India. Mark my words, the same will be happening in Britain. Already, 200 Mullahs in Britain have issued "fatwas" against the terrorists. It won't deter the terrorists but indirectly legitimizes the Mullah's right to issue fatwa, which is a judicial ruling. Will they stop here? Hardly! " said an expert who is close to power circles in Delhi .

Coming back to Sonia, have you ever heard her mention the word Jihad? She is too terrified-- that it may be turned against her. This fear is why she ran to Oxford immediately after Godhra and not long after 9/11, to give a lecture at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies. She could not so 'No' to the invitation.

She will answer every summons and every demand from any Muslim group. Just like Musharraf, whose security depends on staying in uniform, Sonia's security depends on having Hindus protecting her. Sonia is not a strong leader-- she is a weak person in a powerful unconstitutional position. Everyone knows this, but no one seems to know how to expose this. Newspapers don't want to put this in black and white.

Once this becomes a matter of public debate, she is finished. The best way, worldwide (and not just India) is to force a public debate on Jihad. But Britain and Blair are going in the opposite direction-- passing a blasphemy law that bans giving offense to religions. Who do you think will use this-- Muslims or Hindus, Christians and Jews in England?
If you join with Britain now, India will end up having to defend the British.

On Sonia's Weakness

Sonia serves anyone who can blackmail and threaten her-- the Russians, the Muslims. We should not mistake her desperation for strength. This what makes her a national security threat: with so many fears and so many skeletons in her closet, she is a candidate for blackmail. Her "allies" will want her to stay as long as she keeps laying golden eggs. Note that she rushed to see Putin during the Paris Air show, where the big news was India shopping for military aircraft. India is flush with foreign exchange and Russia is in desperate need for it. Putin is a KGB veteran. Don't you think he would put pressure on her to deliver with some business? . KGP transferred $2 billion into her account. They will expect at least $20 billion, at 10% commission. It was obviously not meant as a charity.

The only way of breaking Sonia is to tie her to something so that powerful Western Governments go after her. One way is to expose her as close to Jihadi outfits.What is needed is a series of columns that force Sonia to take a stand on the Islamic terror-- topics like Jihad, not vague statements about extremism, secularism, fundamentalism and the like. Force her to take a stand on Jihad-- something that will draw the ire of Muslims. Her white skin is the only thing Sonia has going for her. Forget the dynasty-- it is her white skin.



CIRCULATE THIS AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE AND SAVE INDIA FROM TRAITORS


www.saveindiaforum.com/includes/downloads/The_Real_Sonia_Gandhi.pdf

SHE IS LIVING AT THE COST OF HINDUS

Dr
by V krishna Friday, Sep. 23, 2005 at 2:23 PM

Who writes this emotive rubbish ? please get a brain.
The trick is to fight Islamic fundamentalism without
demonising all muslims. Why ? because it is civillised and
the more muslims you piss off without good reason the more
recruitment you do for al-queda, and the more Kafirs (non muslims) die. Blair, has largely suceeded in reducing the muslim backlash, but at the same steps are being taken against the islamic fundamentalism cancer which has infected the UK. Panorama (a UK news program) recently exposed the duplicity and fundamentalist leanings of the "muslim council of Britain", which is unprecedented step. People like Modi and Siv Sena leader do not have the solution to the muslim problem. People like Advani and Vajpayee I think are good men. India needs to come clean about the muslim past, the atrocities and genocide. The muslims and hindus both need to talk over the gory details of Indias history. Muslims are guity of atrocities from day one the start of the religion, this has happened many times, recently in Sudan, Bangldesh in 1971, genocide of christian by turkey in 1919. This cycle of evil can only
come to an end if muslims admit they have a problem. Untill they hindus/christians/buddists agnostics etc..etc.. should feel sorry for them but at the same time deal with what ever threats they make.

Only Piss Off The Bad Ones
by Kafir Friday, Sep. 23, 2005 at 2:57 PM

I think that it is entirely okay and accurate to demonize the radical Islamists. Call them what they are.

Certainly, not all Muslims subscribe to the radical racist and genocidal views ot the Islamists. And it would be very nice to hear Muslims consistently and vehemently denouncing the Islamists and the hatred they espouse.

Sonia Gandhi supporting Terror Outfits
by Rajesh Saturday, Nov. 05, 2005 at 10:11 PM

http://boston.indymedia.org/newswire/display/44424/index.php

As we had always suspected, the Iraq scam seems to reach all the way to Sonia Gandhi. Natwar was only a courier-- a bag carrier.

The question we need to ask is-- what is Sonia doing with all the money? She can't possibly need it for her living expenses, with the government taking care of everything.

One european banker suspects : she is being blackmailed by Jihadi groups to fund their outfits. Why else would she be desperate to concede their every demand?

With Paul Volcker getting all this publicity, Sonia - Jihadi links should be given worldwide exposure

Clearly there is a campaign on to save Sonia Gandhi and her dependents. All scams lead it seems to Switzerland like Masefield AG.

Let there be no confusion over this-- the real issue is exposure of Sonia Gandhi and her connections. Natwar Singh is a nobody without the Sonia patronage.

The Swiss connection. In his column yesterday (October 30, Gurumurthy has pointed out that only a third of the money wnet to the Sonia Congress. The remaining two-thirds went into the coffers of a Swintzerland based company called Masefield AG.

Note that Switzerland seems to be the focal point for all Gandhi family corruption funds: BOFORS, the KGB funds ($2 billion reported by the Schweizer Illustrierte) and now Masefield AG.

Can all this be a coincidence? nationalist groups are sufficiently aggressive on this issue.

Also, look at Sonia's silence after the Delhi blasts: "we should be united in our fight against terror." This is what she said after the Ayodhya blasts also-- "the nation should stand as a rock against the divisive forces."

This is a message that we should not blame Muslims for terrorism.

This is an apology for Islamic terrorism which she is too terrified to mention. Has she ever mentioned Jihad or Islamic terror in public?undefined

Sonia & Congress sold our nation to Saddam & KGB
by premendra agrawal Monday, Dec. 05, 2005 at 2:35 PM
premendra_in@indiatimes.com Raipur-492001, India

Oil Scam and Nexus between KGB Spy Sonia Gandhi, Quatrochi & Formigoni. ‘Trimurti’ Sonia Gandhi, Quatrochi & Formigoni all are Catholic Christians Italians
In the past Sonia Gandhi saved her boy friend Quatrochi successfully. Now he is trying to save her beloved minister Natwar Singh.

Rajiv’s untimely death left Sonia Gandhi extremely wealthy. The true extent of her wealth became known only when the Soviet archives were thrown open following the collapse of the Soviet Union. KGB archives revealed that as far back as 1982, when Indira Gandhi was still prime minister, Soviet trading agencies were channeling funds into a company controlled by her son and future Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.
Harvard Russian scholar Yvgenia Albats brought to light the above facts in her book The State Within A State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia. The Swiss newsmagazine Schweizer Illustrierte (November 11, 1991) provided more details. Citing newly-opened KGB records, it reported that Sonia Gandhi, widow of the former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, was controlling a secret account worth 2.5 billion Swiss francs (about 2 billion dollars at current exchange rates) in a Swiss bank in her minor son’s name. Indian columnist A.G. Noorani also reported this in 1998.

For the first time in the history of Independent India a national political party had sold itself to a foreign government so openly and so cheaply. What Sonia Gandhi ‘s congress party did in return for the 40 lakh barrels of oil bribe from Saddam Hussein? The Indian public has a right to know. With this enquiry Sonia Gandhi will be a wanted criminal. Indias Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) should investigate this criminal act that lowered the dignity of our nation and book all those congress politicians involved. Iraqi independent daily Al-Maida’s list of 270 includes two names from INDIA

— `Biham Singh,' at serial number 128, and the `Indian Congress Party,' at serial number 160. `Natora Singh' appears in a report issued on September 30, 2004 by the CIA-run Iraq Survey Group of Charles Duelfer. These did not however create the kind of stir that the recently released Paul Volcker committee report has done.

Iraq based NRI businessman Haridarshan Singh Majie, whose company has been based in Iraq for 30 years, has given several interviews to the media in the past few days corroborating the contents of the Volcker report and the involvement of Mr Singh. A TV channel quoted him as saying that Saddam gave Mr Singh the oil contract after the latter met him in 2001 and presented him the letter from Ms Sonia Gandhi. Mr Majie claimed that Saddam forwarded Ms Gandhi’s letter to the Iraq oil ministry and it was part of record on the basis of which the Volcker Committee prepared its report listing Mr Singh and the Congress as beneficiaries.

According to highly-placed sources, there indeed was a Congress leader (was it Natwar Singh?) who is believed to have told either Hussein or Tariq Aziz that the Congress needed funding as it was in the opposition and being harassed by a rightwing pro-US party.

Natwar had gone to Iraq at the invitation of Tariq Aziz. Times of India dated Dec., 2005, says: Shiv Shankar, ex-petroleum minister and a member of Congress delegation that went to Iraq to shop oil, confirmed Matherani's remarks that Natwar got coupons from Saddam.

In the first letter, dated January 17, 2001, Sonia referred to the old ties between the Congress and the Baath Party, recalling that Baath representatives had been attending plenary sessions of the AICC. She also mentioned the cordial relations, which India had with Iraq under the government headed by ‘‘my husband’’ (Raji Gandhi).
The Congress president, in her letter, stressed that India followed a foreign policy determined by a ‘‘national consensus.’’ Expressing the ‘‘anguish of Congress party over the situation’’ in Iraq, she hoped the UN sanctions against Baghdad would be withdrawn enabling it to rejoin the international community. India, she wrote t Saddam, always stood for meeting Iraq’s humanitarian and infrastructural requirements. In the second letter, dated April 24 2001, Sonia congratulated Saddam on his 64th birthday on April 28 and reiterated the points she had made in the earlier letter.

Political leaders who involved in the Oil Scam, supported Saddam Rigime to criticize US and others. Soia Ganddhi and on her instruction Natwar Sigh did the same job. Uptill now Congress linking Indian Personalities are opening the door of Congress involvement scam to save themselves. They are competing each other for that.
While father K Natwar Singh was quick to dismiss his longtime aide Aneil Mathrani’s U-turn as 'outrageous', son Jagat Singh, a Congress MLA in Rajasthan, slams Congress, says Mathrani had blessings of Sonia, Manmohan.

Sonia’s letters to Saddam and Natwar’s comment confirm the facts. Before his resignation in an interview with a television reporter Natwar disclosed that the Iraqi government lacked credibility and that the US government's invasion of Iraq was illegitimate. In a separate interview, he said that India should reverse its position on Iran's nuclear program. Saddam also gave money to traditional political parties and their leaders who have been making a living publicly hating US. This coalition of cohorts was linked by the common objective of making money from oil, an instance being Indian non-contractual beneficiaries taking the help of Swiss company, Masefield, to lift their quota of oil.

Nimrod Raphaeli, senior analyst at MEMRI in Washington, said,” Why would anybody in the Iraqi Ministry of Petroleum under Saddam Hussein put the name of the Congress Party? What reason do they have? ’’

"Huge numbers of documents discovered in Iraq indicate that Saddam gave oil vouchers worth millions of dollars-redeemable in cash-to French, British and Russian politicians and influential organizations, with the U.N.'s head of the program, Director of OFP,Benon Sevan, down for $3.5 million himself"

In 2002, Formigoni had visited India with a business delegation and praised Sonia Gandhi. Responding to a question on Sonia Gandhi, Formigoni expressesed great admiration, “ I’m happy for her and her own party. She may have been of Italian origin but I must say she has become totally Indian, in her culture and mentality. She is a very interesting lady.” In early 2005 he became embroiled in the Iraq Oil for Food Scandal when an investigation by Il Sole 24 Ore (Italy's leading economic daily) and The Financial Times revealed that he had received an allocation of 24 million barrels of oil from Saddam Hussein's regime.

Fernandes has said in parliament that 'Natwar Singh and Sonia Gandhi' were jointly accused in the Volcker report. He also alleged that transactions from Iraqi oil deals Formigoni and the Congress were deposited in the same bank in Jordan.
I recall my comment, which have been published in various newspapers of June 19, 2005 including:: http://indiatalking.com/blog/premendra/
Sonia, still Italian citizen, was a KGB spy planted by KGB in UK and trapped Rajiv Gandhi.

Sonia played the same trick in Boffor's matter thorugh her relatives and friend in Italy and trhan shadding crockodile tears in Inida.SHe had no reason to give the Italian business mann shelter inn her own house.

premendra_in@indiatimes.com

chump changed
by TheTroll Thursday, Dec. 15, 2005 at 3:48 PM

Britts offering Zionist invadors the palestinian's homeland in the Balfour declaration of war is no less offensive than Hitler offering his Hungarian allies Slovakian lands. So, it is pretty stupid to expect Palestinians to support England's cause when England's cause was destruction of Palestinian lives and lifes through the support of Zionist invasion. And since Germany was at war with those who declared war against the palestinians in thier Balfour declaration of war, it is also pretty stupid to not expect some occupied palestinians meeting with and joining Germany's war against England.

But as for Husseini asking to see gassing of Jews, that is pure propaghanda. He DARED to shake hands with a nazi. Ohhh! Soviets used the same BS tactic. A US diplomat would go to some Soviet state function, meet Soviets and shake thier hands, and SNAPP, and picture gets taken. Anyone the US diplomat got his picture taken with would then be very controlable because the leaders would say the photo prooves espionage. Tactics shows how weak your lies are.